"What I'm not hearing, not seeing, it has never been broached, is the possibility of nominating a white person for this job," Kirsch said. "There seems a disequity in that and it's very uncomfortable for me."
As one of those white voters in the 11th District, I was seriously offended by the implications underlying Kirsch's questions. Sure, as a white person, I was embarrassed by her ill-disguised -- although apparently completely unself-conscious -- racial hostility.But I was more disturbed by the implied relationship between politics and race, and the damage that attitude could have to the candidacy of the first viable African-American presidential contender in the history of our country. Kirsch understands the relationship between an elected representative and his/her constituents is as a quid-pro-quo politics based on primarily, if not entirely, on ethnic identity. The implications of this belief are::
- that rather than govern with objectivity, an African-American congressperson would only look after the interests of African-American voters (and would be more biased than a white congressperson, who presumably would look after everyone equally?)
- that the needs of white and African-American voters are so divergent that meeting the needs of our group necessitates screwing over the other group.
- that white voters of the 11th district are a homogenous group with identical concerns and interests (and yo, I am SO not like you, Marta, you can't begin to imagine)
- that black voters of the 11th district are a homogenous group with identical concerns and interests
But we saw these assumptions writ large in the primary race between Clinton and Obama, in which white male middle-class voters repeatedly told the press that they were more comfortable voting for a white woman than a black man.
I do understand that human beings are more comfortable with people we perceive as being like ourselves.
But it's no way to vote. In fact, it is downright un-American.
From its inception, America has been a democratic republic in which supreme powere rests in the hands of we, the people. Since we can't literally sit all our butts down in Congress, we exert our power through elected representatives. When we vote we're trying to chose the candidate whose background, experience or platform suggests they can be to you that you'llto act for us. individuals to carry in which But the criteria for electing a congressperson or president isn't "guy you'd most like have on your bowling team" or "woman who belongs to the same church I do."


All of your bulletpoints could also be used to criticize blacks and the gerrymandered districts that help to elect them but they never are in the mainstream press.
There is no sense saying anymore on that. This country has cast its lot.
Your second to last paragragh shoud though be singled out for comment when 95% of blacks voted for Obama and there was/is no criticism from a mainstream media outlet. Even wishing for a story on the other 5% which has to be what? Say 50 million blacks in this country half vote or can vote, lets say so one million blacks who voted for McCain or only 500000? It's alot of blacks for sure and you won't hear word one about them as a group, not even once and certainly not regularly.